View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-09, 07:25
mike_bike_kite mike_bike_kite is offline
vaguely human
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by mwangi
Any more suggestions about how to efficiently do this?
My reply was an efficient solution to your original problem. Now you've supplied more information I could suggest having a table only containing the records that you've processed. This will affect performance when selecting the data ie you'll now need to select all the raw data where there isn't a replacement "processed" record and then add all the processed records (this can be done in one select if you like).
Reply With Quote