Welcome to the dBforums forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload your own photos and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact support.

If you prefer not to see double-underlined words and corresponding ads, place your cursor
here for ContentLink opt out.

Go Back  dBforums > Database Server Software > Oracle > database link 8i to 9i

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-04, 10:17
mpchow mpchow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3
Question database link 8i to 9i

I've done the dblink from 9i to 9i w/o problems, and created synonyms, etc. but now I am going from 8.0 to 9.2

The link is there. The DBA says that it's working. I've created a synonym like how I did 9i to 9i (create synonym syn_table_name for tablename@9i.db.globalname.here).But when I create the table in the 8.0 environment (create table x as select * from syn_table_name...) I get ORA-03115: unsupported network datatype or representation, a msg from the 9i db.

So, either 8i can't link to 9i properly, or the syntax is different than 9i to 9i for creating the synonym itself and/or the syntax is different for creating the table in the 8i db.

Any clues? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-04, 11:26
mpchow mpchow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3
Lightbulb progress but not really

So I've narrowed the problem down to a couple of tables from the 9i db that I can't link over to the 8i db. Other tables came over fine. So I'm thinking that there must be something in these 9i tables that are distinct to 9i. I thought of the timestamp field but I tried just bringing over one plain jane numeric column to test my theory, but that didn't work. So I'm back on the drawing table.

Of course luck has it that the 2 tables (and growing) that are the most important to link over to the 8i db are the ones I can't bring over.

I also thought that maybe these tables are too big, but I tried just bringing over the numeric column and weeding it down to just approximately 1,000 records, but still, ORA-03115.

Let me know what you guys think. Thanks,
Melissa.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On