If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > PC based Database Applications > Corel Paradox > Table sorting - W2k/XP vs Win98

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-27-03, 12:38
jsimard16 jsimard16 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2
Angry Secondary Indexes - W2k/XP vs Win98

I have a Paradox application with several tables. The tables sort differently depending if the application is run from W2k/XP or Win98. They all use the same IDAPI cfg file. The sorting is controlled by a secondary index on the table and it sorts correctly in Win98. No errors are reported, just the records sort diffently on the same screen in the application. Everthing is identical except the OS.

If I open the table structure in Windows 98, I can see the Secondary index that controls the sorting. If I open the same table in W2k or XP, I do NOT see the secondary index. Even if I try to add the secondary index using W2k or XP, Paradox will not save the secondary index.

Paradox 10 (Paradox 7 table)

field 1 - Long (sorted a-z)
field 2 - alpha (sorted z-a)
field 3 - money

Any ideas?

Footnote.....

I copied the table to a W2k machine and could not see the secondary index. I re-added the secondary index (on W2k machine) and it kept the setting. I copied the table back to Win 98 and I could no longer see the secondary index from the W2k machine.

Internal long filename conversion???



Thx in advance for any help.

Last edited by jsimard16; 02-27-03 at 15:49.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-03, 17:00
Shores Shores is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bologna - Italy
Posts: 209
It seems to me you're not correctly using aliases, or you're trying to use long names in aliases paths...
__________________
The only failure is not trying to do it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-03, 23:21
jsimard16 jsimard16 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2
Angry

All aliases work fine and all functionality regarding aliases work. The database is located in C:\DB, so long paths should not be the problem. I've given up on the problem and moved on. But thanks for the suggestion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On