If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > General > Database Concepts & Design > refactoring tables for performance

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-04, 09:40
AndrewKT AndrewKT is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 6
refactoring tables for performance

I have a database that I'm trying to optimize to boost performance. Nearly every data (not state/system) table has fields equal or very similar to the below:
Code:
[ClientID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[Invdte] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[MTN] [varchar] (16) NOT NULL ,
[BTN] [varchar] (16) NOT NULL ,
[WTN] [varchar] (50),
[CarrierID] [int] NOT NULL ,
[CDGuid] [varchar] (50) NOT NULL,
[ReportingAccount] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[InvGUID] [uniqueidentifier] NULL
ClientID and InvDte are the most common search fields in most of the tables. 99% of the time, ClientId is included in the search(the data is almost useless without it). InvDte is usually queried by month, meaning that for most queries, we don't care if it's 01/01/04 or 01/31/04 as long as it's in January of 2004.

I'd like to make several of these fields go away, if I can show quantitatively that doing so will improve performance. I have recordsets up to 9 million rows to "show my work" with.

Should I be concerned about varchar's in these ~120 tables? Would there be any benefits to converting them to char's, or key-ing them out of the data tables?

Here's a brief walkthrough of what the data generally looks like:
Every customer of ours has a ClientID. On every CD that we load, we pull at least one MTN(sometimes up to 5 or 10, but only occasionally). For each MTN, there are at least one BTN. The number of BTNs varies by the size of the Client, from 1 to 30 to 200 on the outside. Under each BTN lies between 1 and 100 WTNs usually. CarrierID and CDguid are control fields, the first uniquely identifies the company that provided the CD, the second uniquely Identifies the CD by client/carrier/mtn/invdte. We use these fields primarily for removing data when we're informed that there is an error on a CD.

Please point me in a good direction for improving this structure, make comments, or drop hints of specific things I can research to enlighten myself.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-13-04, 12:18
andrewst andrewst is offline
Moderator.
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 5,171
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewKT
Should I be concerned about varchar's in these ~120 tables? Would there be any benefits to converting them to char's, or key-ing them out of the data tables?
The answer to that question (at least) depends on your DBMS. If it is Oracle then the answer is a resounding "no" - CHAR will just make your tables bigger, which can't help performance.
__________________
Tony Andrews
http://tinyurl.com/tonyandrews
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On