If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > General > Database Concepts & Design > combining field data

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-08, 18:14
crazyjo crazyjo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NV
Posts: 5
Question combining field data

I am working on a database that tracks time, as in how long were the chains on a tire. How would be the best method to track the time so when the data is entered, and the amount of time is lower then the older data? When the time is lower then Access can add them in a total field but not add it if the amount just went up? thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-08, 18:55
blindman blindman is offline
World Class Flame Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,726
CrazyJo make no talky sense!

Reposty please. More clearly ask next time.
__________________
If it's not practically useful, then it's practically useless.

blindman
www.chess.com: "sqlblindman"
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-08, 21:22
Pat Phelan Pat Phelan is offline
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In front of the computer
Posts: 12,605
To paraphrase the blindman, huh ?

-PatP
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-10-08, 21:40
crazyjo crazyjo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NV
Posts: 5
Ok here we go. this database is used to track the amount of time that chains have been on the tire. the field that I am working with is used to enter/log time, in the number of hours that the chains have been on the tire. the problem that we are running into is when the gauge used to show time breaks and the numbers start below the value that was there before. we need to be able to tell that the value entered is being added to the total time, and still be able to track it with the total amount of time and not the now reduced value. this make more since?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 03:27
gvee gvee is offline
www.gvee.co.uk
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 10,156
How does the time start below? Provide sample data please
__________________
George
Twitter | Blog
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 04:38
mike_bike_kite mike_bike_kite is offline
vaguely human
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 2,519
Quote:
the problem that we are running into is when the gauge used to show time breaks and the numbers start below the value that was there before. we need to be able to tell that the value entered is being added to the total time, and still be able to track it with the total amount of time and not the now reduced value.
Your words are all spelt correctly but contain little meaning in their current order. Surely it’s better to just remove the chains when it stops snowing
Quote:
this make more since?
None at all
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 12:22
crazyjo crazyjo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NV
Posts: 5
the chains are on 24/7 365 days a year. the chains are not for snow driving but to protect the tire
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 12:24
crazyjo crazyjo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NV
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgev
How does the time start below? Provide sample data please
Each month an inspection is made on the tires and the chains. After the inspection is made the information is sent from the field to out home office where it is entered into the data base. The time can start below the old data when the gauge used is broken and replaced. For example the chains on loader (moves 350 tons of dirt) could have 20218 hours in use, after the gauge used to track that was broken, a new one was installed and the hour reading started over at zero hours.

Last edited by crazyjo; 06-11-08 at 13:28.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 13:28
blindman blindman is offline
World Class Flame Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,726
I think I understand what you want.
To provide a solution, I will need to see your table design, and some sample data.
__________________
If it's not practically useful, then it's practically useless.

blindman
www.chess.com: "sqlblindman"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 14:05
crazyjo crazyjo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NV
Posts: 5
here is the relationship table and a smaple

I have attached two jpg's with samples. one is the relationship table the send is a view of on account of where this problem has come up. Thanks a bunch for the help
Attached Thumbnails
combining field data-inspection.jpg   combining field data-relationship.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-08, 16:09
blindman blindman is offline
World Class Flame Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11,726
Which table and column is being affected by this issue?
__________________
If it's not practically useful, then it's practically useless.

blindman
www.chess.com: "sqlblindman"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On