If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > General > Database Concepts & Design > dynamic database

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-13-13, 14:48
blindman blindman is offline
World Class Flame Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdella View Post
...just imagine a cup being filled to the brim and as you pour more the size of the cup increases and vice versa. a flexible container would be the best description for this concept. maybe the concept would better be described as similar to a water balloon when water is poured in or drained the size and shape of the balloon changes.
Databases already adapt to the "size" of the data they store.
And adapting to the "shape" of the data they store is what I was warning against above.
__________________
If it's not practically useful, then it's practically useless.

blindman
www.chess.com: "sqlblindman"
www.LobsterShot.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-13, 05:11
cdella cdella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
Ok but it's the scalability of the database that is the point of focus here. And the database would have to adapt to the data
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-13, 10:50
blindman blindman is offline
World Class Flame Warrior
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12,327
One of us is still missing the point.
Databases already scale to the size of the data (if they're properly designed).
Databases can't adapt to the "shape" of the data without sacrificing many of the important features of databases (relational integrity, domains, constraints).
__________________
If it's not practically useful, then it's practically useless.

blindman
www.chess.com: "sqlblindman"
www.LobsterShot.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-13, 12:23
cdella cdella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
ok im aware of the typical relational databases used today however which large amounts of data being produced everyday it would be more resourceful to give this data the ability to behave in such a manner that the data would be retrieved directly from a search without the user being directed to multiple web pages that may hold the same data. in addition the data would be able to store it self in any database according to the size. this would result in a one size fits all database similar to what certain nosql systems are doing

Last edited by cdella; 02-15-13 at 12:27.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-13, 12:48
corncrowe corncrowe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 565
Sounds like you want to create a data virus that morphs into a physical shape depending on size.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-13, 12:53
cdella cdella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
if u take a look at tim berners-lee (the guy usually accredited for inventing the web) and just look up his concept of linked data and the semantic web i think you may understand the concept i have put forward better as i am not great at explaining this yet.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-13, 13:29
Pat Phelan Pat Phelan is offline
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In front of the computer
Posts: 13,558
I'm pretty sure that HADOOP is exactly what you want, and that map / reduce is the key to making sense of the data in its pure (non-semantically enhanced) form.

Big Data | Microsoft SQL Server already delivers the ability to do what I think that you want... Allowing you to add semantic meaning via relational data merged with the HADOOP.

Is this what you're driving toward? If not, please try to explain what I'm missing.

-PatP
__________________
In theory, theory and practice are identical. In practice, theory and practice are unrelated.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-13, 16:27
cdella cdella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
yh i believe this may be exactly what im looking for as ive been told to work with java aswell. i currently have a server setup using the amazon ec2 web service.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-13, 12:48
cdella cdella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 11
does anyone know how i can install hadoop on ubuntu?

Last edited by cdella; 02-18-13 at 14:41.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On