Interpreting the first RC says:
Code:
$ db2diag -rc FFFFC11E
Input ECF string 'FFFFC11E' parsed as 0xFFFFC11E (-16098).
NOTE: ../sqz/sqlzwhatisrc.C:
V7 input ZRC 0xFFFFC11E (-16098) may translate to V8 ZRC value of 0x8402001E (-2080243682)
ZRC value to map: 0x8402001E (-2080243682)
V7 Equivalent ZRC value: 0xFFFFC11E (-16098)
ZRC class :
Non-Critical Media Error (Class Index: 4)
Component:
SQLB ; buffer pool services (Component Index: 2)
Reason Code:
30 (0x001E)
Identifer:
SQLB_CONTAINER_NOT_ACCESSIBLE
Identifer (without component):
SQLZ_RC_CNACCESS
Description:
Container not accessible
Associated information:
Sqlcode -293
SQL0293N Error accessing a table space container.
Number of sqlca tokens : 0
Diaglog message number: 1
In other words, the container /db2owner/db2owner/NODE0000/SQL00001/SQLT0000.0 cannot be accessed. Further, looking at errno 0x1A, which is encountered by sqloopenp (file open), in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h on my Linux system tells me that this error is ETXTBSY and means "Text file busy". You may want to double-check the meaning of errno 0x1A on your platform (you haven't told us that).
Then you should check if the container exists and if there are any interesting things to be found (maybe it is read-only, maybe a link pointing to Nirvana, maybe the directories leading to the container don't exist, maybe something else.
Also, you seem to have some raw containsers (/dev/remserv0*). DB2 notices that the raw disks have a larger size than the container size. You should investigate why this was configured in such an unusual way and fix it, i.e. don't waste the disk space. But those messages are not really an immediate problem, I'd say.