If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > Database Server Software > DB2 > Seeking DB2/AIX64 9.1.5 desaster recovery solution

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-08, 17:43
HanbingL HanbingL is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 15
Seeking DB2/AIX64 9.1.5 desaster recovery solution

Hello DB2 Experts,

We have a Production system that is currently using disc sync to a remote location. But to get the data mounted and function it'll take minimum 2 minutes.

We have DB2/AIX64 9.1.5, what would be the best way to have the Production and DR box sync with no downtime at all?

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-09, 00:07
SuperKuper SuperKuper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 51
If failover time of 2 minutes does not meet your needs, I do not think there is anything else out there that will.
__________________
db2topgun.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-09, 00:31
Marcus_A Marcus_A is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 5,196
HADR coupled with a cluster manager to switch virtual IP addresses will work faster than 2 mintues, usually within 10-20 seconds. I would recommend near-sync mode in HADR.

The only issue is how long it takes for the cluster manager to detect a failure and issue the HADR takeover commands.
__________________
M. A. Feldman
IBM Certified DBA on DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
IBM Certified DBA on DB2 for z/OS and OS/390
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-09, 13:43
sathyaram_s sathyaram_s is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,534
Alternatively, have a look at this :

GRIDSCALE Database Virtualization | GRIDSCALE for DB2

Seems to be endorsed (well, I am using the term loosely) by IBM.

xkoto | Technical Support

Cheers
Sathyaram
__________________
Visit the new-look IDUG Website , register to gain access to the excellent content.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-04-09, 16:08
Marcus_A Marcus_A is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 5,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by sathyaram_s
Alternatively, have a look at this :

GRIDSCALE Database Virtualization | GRIDSCALE for DB2

Seems to be endorsed (well, I am using the term loosely) by IBM.

xkoto | Technical Support

Cheers
Sathyaram
At one time about 2 years ago, IBM was strongly hinting that it was in the process of bying xkoto, but something happened and the deal fell through. We tried it at my company, and it scales well for read type queries, but does not work as well for heavy updates. And despite what they tell you, there is still a single point of failure on the load balancer (which has its own cluster/failover mechanism, but that failover is no better than HADR failover).
__________________
M. A. Feldman
IBM Certified DBA on DB2 for Linux, UNIX, and Windows
IBM Certified DBA on DB2 for z/OS and OS/390
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On