| |
|
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
|
 |

04-09-09, 11:49
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 41
|
|
|
Using Temporary Table instead of querying multiple times
|
|
Hello,
I am writing a procedure, and i am using same query 4 times to update/ insert in different tables. Is it better to dumb data in temp table and then query temp table or querying again and again to get same result set
e,g
1. merge into table1 using ( select x,y,z from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
2. merge into table2 using ( select x,y,z from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
3. Insert into table3 (x,y, p) ( select x,y,z*3 from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
Or
1 Insert into temptab (x,y, p) ( select x,y,z*3 from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
2 merge into table1 using ( select x,y,z from temptab)
3 merge into table2 using ( select x,y,z from temptab)
4 Insert into table3 (x,y, p) ( select x,y,z*3 from temptab)
>>> tab2 & tab3 are big tables 12000000 rows and growing
>>> temptab may be 1000 at most
Is there a better way
Thanks in advance
|
|

04-09-09, 11:52
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 113
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by phil72
Hello,
I am writing a procedure, and i am using same query 4 times to update/ insert in different tables. Is it better to dumb data in temp table and then query temp table or querying again and again to get same result set
e,g
1. merge into table1 using ( select x,y,z from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
2. merge into table2 using ( select x,y,z from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
3. Insert into table3 (x,y, p) ( select x,y,z*3 from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
Or
1 Insert into temptab (x,y, p) ( select x,y,z*3 from tab2 left join tab3 ....)
2 merge into table1 using ( select x,y,z from temptab)
3 merge into table2 using ( select x,y,z from temptab)
4 Insert into table3 (x,y, p) ( select x,y,z*3 from temptab)
>>> tab2 & tab3 are big tables 12000000 rows and growing
>>> temptab may be 1000 at most
Is there a better way
Thanks in advance
|
You can use 'global temp table' for the purpose (i.e the 2nd method)
|
|

04-09-09, 13:11
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,575
|
|
|
|
As long as you have the proper indexes to optimize the queries in the first scenario, then I would go with that. There will be one less DB access (3 steps instead of 4).
If you do not have the indexes, then scenario 2 would be better because the major cost would be the big query on tab2, tab3, ..., and you would only do it once in the second scenario whereas you would do it twice in the first.
Andy
|
|

04-09-09, 13:22
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 113
|
|
3nd option,
1) use 'cross load' utility to unload the query result set
2) use 'load' utility to load the result set back to table 1
3) use 'load' utility to load the result set back to table 2
4) use 'load' utility to load the result set back to table 3
...
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|