Hi, All
On both DB2 version i create one compressed table (in it's own tablespace/DMS container).
After LOADding 67M rows i check what DMS-container size is :
On 9.5.3 - 12 Gb
On 9.7.0 - 12
.6 Gb
Why 5% difference (600Mb) is presented on 9.7 ?
Is it some change in compression algorithm on 9.7 ?
The test table contain only VARCHAR, INTEGER and DECIMAL columns.
No other tables are presented in databases (pure test)
Also, i LOAD the same 67M rows in regular table on 9.7 and see what container size for its' tablespace is 14.9 Gb
I check view SYSIBMADM.ADMINTABCOMPRESSINFO for compressed table and see what PAGES_SAVED_PERCENT and BYTES_SAVED_PERCENT is 77%
But the real size is of tables (compressed vs noncompressed) is 12.6 Gb vs 14.9 Gb
Where is this 77% difference ?
WBR, Dmitry