If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > Database Server Software > DB2 > connection concentrator: SORT consequences?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-10, 04:47
dr_te_z dr_te_z is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Zoetermeer, Holland
Posts: 294
connection concentrator: SORT consequences?

Currently I am working with a DB2 V8.2 32 bit on aix. The application does not allow me to upgrade to a 64 bit version of DB2 so tuning memory is a delicate matter.
I am concidering to activate connection concentrating (MAX_CONNECTIONS > MAX_COORDAGENTS) and when I read this:DB2 UDB performance tuning scenarios: Part 1, DB2 UDB OLTP tuning illustrated with a Java program I understand that this will affect the sort-behaviour of DB2. What I do understand is that all sorts are private now (so only SORTHEAP is used). What I do not understand how sort is going to behave after my change: will all sorts be shared now? Will there be a mix of shared and private sorts?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-10, 07:47
n_i n_i is offline
:-)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,283
I think the point is that when the connection concentrator is enabled, memory for sorts is allocated from the database's shared sort heap rather than from each agent's private memory pool.

Take a look also at this: http://www-1.ibm.com/support/entdocv...id=swg21179841
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-10, 07:58
dr_te_z dr_te_z is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Zoetermeer, Holland
Posts: 294
Seems to be top-secret information
The credentials you provided do not entitle you to the document or resource you have requested....
Does this mean that I can set the SORTHEAP to zero?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-19-10, 08:21
n_i n_i is offline
:-)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,283
It requires free registration at the IBM support web site. Try searching for document no. swg21179841
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-10, 06:55
dr_te_z dr_te_z is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Zoetermeer, Holland
Posts: 294
Finally I've managed to read the document. It does not answer my question. I guess nobody really knows so I have to figure it out myself....
I'll keep you informed.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On