Quote:
Originally posted by blom0344
I wouldn't expect much difference in performance, but SQL server T-SQL misses out some of the functions as offered with DB2
|
Like what? It's been the otherway around for the longest time. What feature are you referring to?
Quote:
|
In most cases SQL server is quite a bit cheaper
|
Esp. If you have to worry about mainframe DASD charges...
Quote:
|
has MUCH better GUI tools and is more 'self supporting' . You have to invest more into DB2 to get to know the ins and outs, more fun really :-)
|
GUI's are overrated, and all high end SQL Server dudes and dudettes use Query Analyzer...kinda a like a notepad you can execute SQL in.
And to answer the question, it's like apples and oranges. SQL Server vs DB2 (on the mainframe)...it's like culture shock between thos 2 worlds.
What resources do you have? That's the question. Or do you plan to hire consultants?
How much data will you have? Growth? Number of Fact/dimensions?
Where are your primary user community located?
How many disparate data sources do you have to deal with?
Do you already have mainframe? N/T Server?
Sorry...just a couple of questions...