If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

 
Go Back  dBforums > Database Server Software > Informix > Trying to recover Secondary using ontape -l

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-29-03, 14:59
antzz antzz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 41
Trying to recover Secondary using ontape -l

I have an HDR setup (IDS 7.31 on SCO UNIX). As an experiment, I shutdown the Secondary for the weekend. I have logical log backups every hour on the Primary using a disk file. On the first workday, I restarted the Secondary and it went into Fast Recovery(Sec) mode. The message log prompted me to start recovery from tape (i.e. the logs have already cycled on the Primary). I redirected the first disk file backup to my LTAPEDEV device and started ontape -l. It stated that I have to roll forward using log number 21270 and prompted me to insert another tape? Now, I know that the disk file I have contains log number 21270.
Why isn't ontape detecting this???

Is there a trick or special way to recover from disk files?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-30-03, 08:11
gurey gurey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Argentina
Posts: 780
Re: Trying to recover Secondary using ontape -l

Quote:
Originally posted by antzz
I have an HDR setup (IDS 7.31 on SCO UNIX). As an experiment, I shutdown the Secondary for the weekend. I have logical log backups every hour on the Primary using a disk file. On the first workday, I restarted the Secondary and it went into Fast Recovery(Sec) mode. The message log prompted me to start recovery from tape (i.e. the logs have already cycled on the Primary). I redirected the first disk file backup to my LTAPEDEV device and started ontape -l. It stated that I have to roll forward using log number 21270 and prompted me to insert another tape? Now, I know that the disk file I have contains log number 21270.
Why isn't ontape detecting this???

Is there a trick or special way to recover from disk files?
Hi,

I suggest to you do back-up of level 0 of the primary on_line, you
soon lower in secondary and the East both instances to it.

Gustavo.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On